#76 metonymy   7 years ago (owner) Document
"we are using one entity to refer to another that is related to it. This is a case of what we will call metonymy." (#60 660)
"Metaphor and metonymy are different kinds of processes. Metaphor is principally a way of conceiving of one thing in terms of another, and its primary function is understanding. Metonymy, on the other hand, has primarily a referential function, that is, it allows us to use one entity to stand for another. But metonymy is not merely a referential device. It also serves the function of providing understanding." (#60 676)
"like metaphors, m├ętonymie concepts structure not just our language but our thoughts, attitudes, and actions." (#60 750)
"In fact, the grounding of m├ętonymie concepts is in general more obvious than is the case with metaphoric concepts, since it usually involves direct physical or causal associations. The part for whole metonymy, for example, emerges from our experiences with the way parts in general are related to wholes. producer for product is based on the causal (and typically physical) relationship between a producer and his product, the place for the event is grounded in our experience with the physical location of events. And so on." (#60 751)
  • → #77 synecdoche   7 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #89 Experience with physical objects provides the basis for metonymy   7 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #149 real-world objects standing for entities in the world as defined by the conceptual system of the religion   7 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #150 THE HOME STANDS FOR THE PERSON   7 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #165 In a metonymy, there is only one domain   7 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #166 Metonymy and Metaphor   7 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #136 experiential correlations: experiential cooccurrence and experiential similarity   cross-domain correlations     6 years ago (owner) Document