#71 experiential basis   10 years ago (owner) Document
"In actuality we feel that no metaphor can ever he comprehended or even adequately represented independently of its experiential basis." (#60 396)
"Within the experientialist myth, understanding emerges from interaction, from constant negotiation with the environment and other people. It emerges in the following way: the nature of our bodies and our physical and cultural environment imposes a structure on our experience, in terms of natural dimensions of the sort we have discussed. Recurrent experience leads to the formation of categories, which are experiential gestalts with those natural dimensions. Such gestalts define coherence in our experience. We understand our experience directly when we see it as being structured coherently in terms of gestalts that have emerged directly from interaction with and in our environment. We understand experience metaphorically when we use a gestalt from one domain of experience to structure experience in another domain." (#60 3833)
 
  • → + #87 direct physical experience   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #116 interactional properties   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #106 experiential gestalt   integrity     10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #160 primary metaphors   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #136 experiential correlations: experiential cooccurrence and experiential similarity   cross-domain correlations     10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #147 the perspective of man as part of his environment   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #151 ritual   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → + #155 the common nature of our bodies and the shared ways that we all function in the everyday world   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #70 how well its metaphors fit one's experience   10 years ago (owner) Document
  • → #135 "We agree with objectivists on one major point: that things in the world do play a role in constrain...   10 years ago (owner) Document